![]() ![]() Kubuntu, the KDE Ubuntu, is also available, although because of development politics, it is now developed independently, and no longer has a link on the Ubuntu web site. Other desktop environments continue to be available either from the repositories or from different flavors of Ubuntu, such as Xubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu MATE and Ubuntu Budgie. However, the 18:04 release will mark a return to GNOME as the default desktop. Ubuntu: Desktopsīetween 2010-17, Ubuntu developed its own desktop called Unity. However, in the event of difficulties, Ubuntu uses an a rebranded version of Debian’s as an expert installer. Nine alternatives or “ flavors,” are available, ranging from ones for specific purposes, such as the educational-oriented Edubuntu, and the Chinese language Kylin to ones with different default desktop environments, such as Lubuntu, which installs LXDE and Xubuntu, which installs Xfce.īy default, all these choices for Ubuntu use an installer designed to require a minimum of user input. In comparison, Ubuntu’s installer concentrates on 32 and 64 bit versions of Intel architecture for desktops and servers, although in recent years it has moved into ARM development as well. In fact, with the Debian Installer available for ten hardware architectures and in text, graphical and voice formats, and with an expert mode for troubleshooting, if you cannot install Debian on your hardware, then very likely you will be unable to install any Linux distribution. Ubuntu: InstallationĬontrary to the lingering myth, modern Debian is no harder to install than any other distribution. Despite their common origin, Debian and Ubuntu differ in their installers, desktop environments, administration, and communities as well. Yet these general descriptions are only part of the story. ![]() Today, Debian can best be described as a distribution for everyone, easy to install for anyone who can follow instructions, but with the potential for detailed control that will satisfy experts. Modern Debian is also focused on its role as the source of other distributions, including not only Ubuntu, but also distributions like Linux Mint, the distribution that has been consistently first on Distrowatch in the last four years. ![]() For now, Ubuntu seems no more innovative than Debian.Īt the same time, modern Debian is easier to install than ever before, and is imitating Ubuntu with Long Time Support releases for users who value stability over the latest software. Although the recent abandonment of Unity in favor of GNOME could mean a return to innovation on the Ubuntu desktop, it is still too early to tell. Meanwhile, Canonical seems more concerned with OpenStack, embedded systems and servers. For over six years, the emphasis was on the development of the Unity desktop into a common interface for phones, tablets, and desktops. Under the direction of the parent company Canonical, Ubuntu development has been focused elsewhere. Moreover, Ubuntu’s days of interface innovations are largely in the past. However, thanks to free licenses, Ubuntu’s improvements have spread to most desktop environments. ![]() However, that distinction is more historic than contemporary.Īfter Ubuntu burst on to the scene in late 2004, it spent several years making the desktop easier to use, especially for non-English speakers. You may have heard that Debian is a distribution for experts, and Ubuntu for beginners. They remain closely related, although if you look closely subtle differences in direction and orientation start to emerge Together, they form one of the greatest influences on Linux development, and that influence seems likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Since 2005, neither has been out of the top six. For the last four years, Debian and Ubuntu have been in the top three Linux distributions on Distrowatch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |